WASPE Double Flavor 100K Pro Review: 56mL Dual-Flavor Disposable Tested (2026)
WASPE’s second-gen dual-flavor disposable pushes the format further with 56mL of juice and independent coils, but the 600mAh battery means you’re charging more than you’d expect.
The 100K Club Gets a Twin-Engine Makeover
Every major disposable brand is chasing the 100K puff mark right now. HorizonTech’s got theirs. iJOY’s got theirs. Almost all of them come with a trade-off though: you get one flavor, one coil, one experience for the life of the device. That’s fine if you’re the type who finds one juice and sticks with it. What if you’re not though?

That’s the question WASPE asked with the Double Flavor 100K Pro. Instead of cramming more battery into the same single-flavor formula, they built something refreshingly different — a disposable with two chambers, two mesh coils, and a sliding mouthpiece that lets you switch flavors whenever you want. I’ve been testing the Lemon Lime and Strawberry Vanilla Cola combo for about a week, and honestly? It’s the most interesting disposable I’ve picked up this year! It’s also got some quirks I didn’t expect.
Specs That Actually Matter
Before I get into the experience, here’s what you’re actually working with.

| Spec | Value |
|---|---|
| Puff count | Up to 100,000 |
| E-liquid capacity | 56mL (28mL × 2 independent chambers) |
| Nicotine strength | 0% / 2% / 5% (tested 2%) |
| Coil | 0.9Ω mesh × 2 (one per chamber) |
| Battery | 600mAh, USB-C rechargeable |
| Display | Side-mounted digital screen (battery level + status) |
| Dimensions | 65 × 30 × 125mm |
| Weight | 130g |
That 56mL figure is the headline here. For context, most 100K disposables pack 33-40mL of juice. WASPE Double Flavor 100K Pro gives you 40-70% more liquid than the competition, split into two flavors you can bounce between. Trade-off? That 600mAh battery. It’s small for this much juice — expect to charge a lot more often than you would on the HorizonTech 100K with its 1500mAh cell.
What It Feels Like Out of the Box

I’ll be honest: when I first picked this up, I wasn’t expecting much. A bright yellow disposable with a flower pattern on the back? It’s giving “gas station impulse buy” energy. Then I slid the mouthpiece.
That click is so satisfying when it locks in place! You push it to the left, it locks in. Push it right, same thing! It’s not loose, not stiff, but just right. Most dual-flavor disposables I’ve tried use a button or a switch, and they always feel like an afterthought. WASPE built the entire design around this slide mechanism, and it shows.
At 130g, it’s noticeably heavier than a standard disposable. That’s the dual coil and dual chamber adding weight. It doesn’t feel cheap. The plastic body is solid, the black trim accents break up the yellow nicely, and the transparent crystal mouthpiece looks better in person than it does in photos.
One thing that caught me off guard: the size. At 125mm tall, it’s taller than most disposables. It fits in a pocket, though you’ll know it’s there.
The Sliding Door: How the Dual-Flavor System Works


Here’s the thing — a lot of budget dual-flavor disposables share a single coil between two reservoirs via an airflow switch, which leads to flavor contamination between chambers, uneven wicking, and one coil doing double duty for two different profiles. That means flavor contamination between chambers, uneven wicking, and one coil doing double duty for two different profiles.
WASPE didn’t cut that corner with the 100K Pro. Their device has two independent 0.9Ω mesh coils, one per chamber. When you slide the mouthpiece, you’re physically switching which coil and which chamber you’re drawing from. I cracked mine open to confirm, and yep, two separate atomizer units in there.
What does that mean in practice? Clean flavor separation! No weird hybrid taste when you go from Lemon Lime to Strawberry Vanilla Cola. Each flavor tastes exactly like it should because each one has its own dedicated coil. That’s a level of engineering I didn’t expect from a disposable!

That side-mounted LED screen is a nice touch too. It shows battery level and a few status indicators. It’s simple. No puff counter, no wattage readout. For a disposable though, it’s more than most offer. I just wish the screen was on the front instead of the side, because when it’s in your pocket, you can’t check battery without pulling it out entirely.
Small gripe. Everything else just works, y’know?
Real-World Testing: What I Measured
I can’t hit the full 100K puffs in a week, though I tracked what I could. I used the 2% nicotine version (Kevin’s sample), charging with a standard 1A USB-C brick.
| Test Item | Claimed | Measured | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Charge time 0→100% | N/A | ~52 minutes | Measured 1.0A draw consistently |
| Puffs per charge | N/A | ~420 puffs | 2-second draws, moderate use |
| Battery 0→dead | N/A | ~2.5 days moderate use | ~150-180 puffs/day |
| Flavor consistency | N/A | Consistent across 7 days | No noticeable drop-off yet |
That 52-minute charge time isn’t bad — it’s about what I’d expect from a 600mAh cell with 1A charging. A bigger issue is how often you have to do it. At 2.5 days between charges with moderate use, you’re plugging this thing in roughly every other day. For context on what to expect, our guide on how long disposable vapes actually last covers real-world battery performance across different models. Compare that to the HorizonTech 100K’s multi-day battery, and it’s a noticeable step down.
On the plus side, flavor consistency across my test period has been rock-solid. Seven days in, no muting, no burnt hits, no gurgling. Those dual coils are doing their job.
Two Flavors, Two Opinions

I tested the Lemon Lime and Strawberry Vanilla Cola combo. Two very different profiles, which is exactly what you want from a dual-flavor system. No point having both chambers taste similar, right?
Lemon Lime: The Champion
This is the star of the pair. Think a freshly squeezed lime, not that sour candy version you get from gas station vapes. There’s a tartness up front that fades into something almost sweet on the exhale. Lemon comes through as a background note, not overpowering; just there to round out the citrus. It’s the kind of flavor you’d happily vape all day. I kept sliding back to this one!
Strawberry Vanilla Cola: The Wild Card
Strawberry hits first, sweet and almost jammy, then the cola shows up on the finish with a hint of vanilla. It’s not a combo I’d have thought to try, and it took me a couple days to decide how I felt. Some hits strike a perfect, weirdly addictive balance. Others, the cola overpowers and you wonder where the strawberry went. I think this depends on how often you switch chambers. Longer breaks between hits let the wick saturate fully, making the flavor more consistent.
That complexity is actually part of why I appreciate this device. It’s not playing it safe with predictable fruit blends. It’s trying something weird, and weird doesn’t always land, but I’d rather a disposable take risks than give me another generic watermelon ice.
There are 16 flavor combinations in the lineup. I’ve only tested two, and if the rest follow the same philosophy of pairing unexpected profiles, there’s probably something for everyone here.

How It Stacks Up Against the 100K Crowd
The 100K puff segment is getting crowded fast — you can see the full lineup in our ranking of the best 100K disposables. WASPE’s approach actually stands out though. Here’s how it compares to the main players.
| Product | Puffs | Juice | Battery | Flavors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WASPE 100K Pro | 100K | 56mL | 600mAh | Dual (sliding) |
| HorizonTech 100K | 100K | 40mL | 1500mAh | Single |
| iJOY XP100K | 100K | 33mL | 1500mAh | Single + refillable |
| Flum UT Bar 50K | 50K | 26mL | 800mAh | Dual (dual-mode) |
| WASPE 40K Twins | 40K | 36mL | 850mAh | Dual (predecessor) |
WASPE’s biggest advantage is obvious: 56mL of juice is a monster amount! You’re getting 40% more than the HorizonTech and 70% more than the iJOY. That dual-coil setup also means genuine flavor separation, which nobody else in the 100K segment is doing right now. I recently reviewed the Kangertech Subox Mix 50K, which takes a magnetic pod approach to dual flavors, and the RAZ Vue 50K for a rechargeable hybrid take. For an even higher puff count, the OXBAR Maglink 75K stretches to 75K with a modular design.
The HorizonTech’s 1500mAh battery puts the WASPE’s 600mAh to shame. If battery life matters more to you than flavor variety, that’s the better pick. And the iJOY’s refillable design means you’re not limited to pre-filled flavors, which is a different kind of flexibility entirely.
Its predecessor, the WASPE 40K Twins, earned a 4.8/5 across 196 reviews on retailer sites. That’s a strong reputation to build on, and the 100K Pro feels like a genuine upgrade rather than just a puff-count bump.
The Cost Per Puff

Wholesale pricing puts the WASPE 100K Pro at €5.99-11.99, though US retail isn’t confirmed yet. If it lands around $19.99-24.99 (comparable to other 100K disposables and our picks for the best disposable vapes of 2026), here’s the math. Retailers like Aiviou Vapes carry the WASPE lineup — worth checking for availability in your region.
At 56mL of juice across 100K puffs, you’re getting roughly 0.56mL per 100 puffs. Compare that to the HorizonTech’s 40mL at 0.4mL per 100 puffs — you’re getting 40% more juice per puff with the WASPE.
Cost per 100 puffs at $22.99 (estimated): about $0.023. A pack of cigarettes where I am costs about $0.50 per cigarette. That’s $5.00 per 100 cigarettes. You’re spending less than 5% of what cigarettes would cost for the same number of draws! Even against other disposables, the dual-coil efficiency means you’re getting more flavor per puff before the juice runs out.
Buy It or Skip It?
Buy it if:
- You get bored of one flavor and want to switch without carrying two devices
- You’re coming from the WASPE 40K and want a straight upgrade
- You vape moderate amounts and want the juice to last — if you prefer a 50K option, the Geek Bar CLR 50K is another solid choice
Skip it if:
- Battery life is your #1 priority. 600mAh means frequent charging
- You prefer refillable devices and don’t want pre-filled disposables
- You’re a heavy vaper who’ll drain that 600mAh in half a day
Pros & Cons
What I Liked
- Genuine dual-flavor with independent coils, so no flavor cross-contamination
- 56mL juice capacity is the most in the 100K class by a wide margin
- Sliding mouthpiece feels premium, not like a gimmick
- Consistent flavor across a week of testing
What Could Be Better
- 600mAh battery means charging every 2-3 days. It should be at least 1000mAh for this much juice
- Side-mounted screen is hard to check when the device is in your pocket
- Strawberry Vanilla Cola flavor is inconsistent. Great some hits, confused others
- No US retail pricing confirmed yet, which makes value hard to judge

Frequently Asked Questions
Can you switch flavors on the WASPE Double Flavor 100K Pro?
Yes. A sliding mouthpiece moves left or right to switch between two independent flavor chambers. Each chamber has its own 0.9Ω mesh coil, so there’s no flavor mixing between them.
How much e-liquid does the WASPE 100K Pro hold?
It holds 56mL total, with 28mL per chamber. That’s the largest capacity in any 100K puff disposable currently available — 40% more than the HorizonTech 100K (40mL) and 70% more than the iJOY XP100K (33mL).
How long does the WASPE 100K Pro battery last?
About 2.5 days of moderate use (150-180 puffs per day) between charges. A 600mAh battery takes roughly 52 minutes to charge fully via USB-C. It’s adequate yet underwhelming compared to competitors with 1500mAh cells.
Is the WASPE 100K Pro refillable?
No. Like most high-capacity disposables, it’s a sealed, pre-filled device. Once the juice runs out, the device is finished. There’s always the iJOY XP100K as a refillable alternative in the same puff class.
How many flavors does the WASPE 100K Pro come in?
There are 16 flavor pairings in the lineup. Each device comes with two pre-filled flavors, and you choose the combo when you buy. Not all retailers carry the full range yet since the device just launched in May 2026.
Final Verdict
I keep coming back to that slide mechanism. It’s such a small thing, yet it changes how I use the device. I’d honestly pick this over a single-flavor 100K device any day, even with the battery frustration. Instead of committing to one flavor for 100K puffs, I can bounce between two moods. That’s a freedom most disposables don’t give you.
Does the 600mAh battery frustrate me? Yeah, it does. For a device with 56mL of juice, you’d expect a cell that can keep up. I get that the dual coils take up space, though — there’s a design trade-off here that favors flavor variety over battery endurance, and not everyone’s going to love that equation. I sure don’t love plugging this thing in every other day.
WASPE has built something refreshingly different with the 100K Pro. It’s not perfect — I’ll be upfront about that. The charging frequency alone will push some buyers toward the HorizonTech or iJOY alternatives. If you value flavor variety and clean coil separation over max battery life, this is the most interesting disposable in the 100K class right now. I’d pick it over the competition, battery headaches and all. It’s the kind of device that makes you wonder why nobody thought of a proper dual-coil sliding system sooner.
Last updated: June 2026
Disclaimer: This review is based on a sample provided for testing purposes. Prices and availability may vary by retailer. Vape Observation maintains editorial independence and doesn’t accept payment for positive reviews.
Warning: This product contains nicotine. Nicotine is an addictive chemical. For adults 21+ only. Keep out of reach of children and pets. Learn more at the CDC’s e-cigarette information page.
Tags: dual flavor disposable
Kevin Li — Founder & Editor, VapeObservation.com Kevin reviews vape products hands-on, prioritizing real-world performance over manufacturer claims. His goal: honest, practical advice that helps everyday vapers make informed choices. Before launching VapeObservation, he was a longtime vaper frustrated by promotional content disguised as reviews. Every article on the site reflects his commitment to data-driven, reader-first testing.

